Most rewarding is the way the mid-range opens up, whether you're applying subtle or crunchier distortion. The only real comparison is when you compare there emulations head to head. Plug bundles like fab filter, mcdsp, sound toys, soft tube, etc. And that begs the question: if tape machines are so inherently imperfect, why do we like the way they sound? The Brit ssl 4kE is my favorite out of the vcc. Finally, the Nevo console beefed up the snare drum, enhanced the mid-range a little bit and subtly rolled off the high end. Does this depend on the material? This makes me so fucking happy. Saturn is also a great colour box - just turn the mix % down low and play with warm tape and tube modes.
The three console models certainly have their own specific sound: I'd say that the Mike console is the smoothest-sounding, the Nevo the most transparent-sounding, and the Spike console the one with the most bite. Slate sounds incredibly real and nuanced. I mentioned that if you aren't a hobbyist, having an iLok around isn't a bad thing, even if you don't yet own any iLok plugins - eventually you will get to that point. I hear a lot of talk on here about waves L2. In reality, though, the effect of going via a really well set-up tape machine can be quite subtle.
Do not post pictures of text here, they will be removed. He made it to the first page at least! Last updated: 3 days ago. The multiple groups allow you to apply different settings to different sets of tracks, such as multitrack drums and guitars, to best suit the material. Which one sounded inconsistent, so varied on attack a little and things. Api and Kramer stuff here and there.
You really need to switch the plug-in in and out to hear what it is doing, as listening to an untreated file and then a treated one, with a delay between, makes it harder to spot the difference. The magnetic hysteresis and hence gross non-linearity exhibited by the metallic particles that make up recording tape means that simply feeding a signal to a tape head and then running tape past it would result in unusably distorted playback. The fact that you feel a profound sense of disappointment when you bypass the plug-in says it all, really! Then if it sounded a little heavier on the bottom it might be hardware. There isn't a simple answer, though, as all three model different tape machines set up by different engineers. This saga went on for a couple of months during which I ended up installing Window multiple time and reinstalling my plugins, etc.
Tape was used to make so many great records over a period of so many decades that we have come to associate the sound of these records with the way recorded music should sound. It is not a way to determine their different qualities, as I am not able to try both of them. My answer would, other than the odd Waves plugin that suits you, be: neither. If you knew what I was offering as an answer was actually the best answer, then I fail to understand why you're upset. As you'd expect, you hear the most difference with the meter pushed well into the red. That's no reason to throw a hissy and double down on the passive aggression.
Digital may be way more accurate these days, but many people still prefer the sound of tape. What else do you have a problem with? These variations should be so minimal as to be unnoticeable most of the time on a good-quality machine, but even at low levels, they can contribute to this mystical analogue warmth we keep banging on about. As you might imagine, these effects pose a significant challenge to anyone trying to model them — and there's still a lot more more to come. Last updated: 3 days ago. I'd rather not deal with the iLok unless it is overwhelmingly necessary. As someone who does this full time I don't like wading through the posts from kids with their macbooks. Bass Alignment allows the low-end response of the tape itself to be adjusted, while the amount of wow and flutter can be controlled to taste a setting of around 25 percent corresponds to a well-maintained machine.
I think that when it comes to dogged persistence in modelling the true detail of a tape machine, Slate probably get as close to the real thing as is practical but, on the other hand, the only thing that really matters at the end of the day is how successful the process is in a musical context. I believe that crosstalk is one of the factors that help glue a mix together, and it would be interesting to hear how the plug-in would sound with crosstalk modelled. When optimally adjusted, bias allows the dynamic response of the tape to behave in a linear way up until the point where the tape itself starts to saturate — there's only so much magnetic charge a piece of metallic oxide can hold. You can do all of the same stuff, like using the gain to get serious distortion, or pressing more than one button down at time. A little while back my computer's motherboard went bad, the replacement motherboard had issues, during these issues my hard drive got corrupted, etc. These are two identical products from two very different companies, there is no harm in asking for notable differences or any general consensus regarding the two.
Universal Audio La2a Teletronix vs. Decapitator is an industry standard, but that doesn't mean Klangheim isn't on par sound-wise. These threads never end well for the snobby dudes. The same setting in the Mike console produced a rather grainy sound indicating less headroom; at a Drive setting of 9, the snare drum thickened up a little bit and got some mid-range graininess that sounded rather nice. The third mixer modelled is a Neve belonging to producer and engineer Yoad Nevo. As if that wasn't enough, there's also the high-frequency bias signal to be taken into account. Comparing Slate Digital vs Waves may also be of use if you are interested in such closely related search terms as slate digital vcc or waves nls, slate digital vs waves, slate digital vs waves nls, slate digital vtm vs waves and slate digital vcc vs waves.
It was discovered back in the pioneering days of tape recording that adding a very high-frequency tone, or bias typically 60kHz to 250kHz depending on the machine and manufacturer, with 100kHz being a common choice , to the audio produced a far more linear response. My 1073, 610 and Api vision channel sound amazing. This in-depth comparison of slatedigital. That said, I see no problem with seeing what the consensus is within the audio community, especially for beginners whether or not you are one. I've read the entire thread, and other users offered objective, applicable information as I requested.
Also, unless audio engineering is just a hobby for you, it's likely that you'll eventually need to purchase an ilok. I guess it could be argued that the hardware sounds 'warmer' but to me, it sounded duller and less lively. You're not being an ass, but you're essentially telling me I need to own both products, and that doesn't help my situation. Just because I have better. The Waves plugin gets things kind of mushy and it sounded like it brought the bass up in an odd way. Dan Grem I have zero issues with iLok. A cool feature is that 32 different channels on each console have been measured and modelled to mimic the subtle channel variations on the consoles.